Environmental
Planning:
Key Concepts in Environmental Planning
QUESTIONS |
TOOLS |
Who are they? |
demographic analysis |
What do they do? |
economic analysis |
Where do these activities occur? |
land use analysis |
How are human activities connected spatially?" |
transportation analysis |
What is Planning?
It is the act or process of making or carrying out plans. specifically : the establishment of goals, policies, and procedures for a social or economic unit
A basic management function involving formulation of
one or more detailed plans to achieve optimum balance of needs or demands with
the available resources. The planning process
(1) identifies the goals or objectives to be
achieved,
(2) formulates strategies to achieve them,
(3) arranges or creates the means required, and
(4) implements, directs, and monitors all steps in
their proper sequence
Legal Definition of
Environmental Planning
According to REPUBLIC ACT No. 10587,
" Environmental Planning Act of 2013,"
Environmental planning is defined as urban
and regional planning, city planning, town and country planning, and/or human
settlements planning, refers to the multi-disciplinary art and science of
analyzing, specifying, clarifying, harmonizing, managing and regulating the use
and development of land and water resources, in relation to their environs, for
the development of sustainable communities and ecosystems. (Sec. 4 (a) of R.A.
10587)
Other definition:
“refers to activities connected with the management
and development of land, as well as the preservation, conservation and
management of the human environment”
- Presidential
Decree No. 1308, March 2, 1978
Objective is to liberate communities from urban blight
and congestion and promote ecological balance
- PD
933, series of 1976, Decree Creating the Human Settlements Commission, later
HSRC, later HLURB
1. A framework for
growth - Thriving cities have a vision and follow it through with a framework
to develop in an orderly manner. A framework is not about centralized command
and control but a way to anticipate needs, coordinate efforts, and draw a path
to a horizon that is collectively held. Major efforts to enhance livability, prosperity
and equity have taken place in a number of well known cities. Such
transformational impact is not a product of spontaneity, instead of
constructive planning.
2. A planned city
is a well prepared city - Anticipating the future allows us to be better
prepared today. By staying ahead of challenges, city leaders are ready to see
opportunities and manage risks from a vantage point. With reliable information
on the current situation, they will be able to make connections between the
long-term vision and short term actions. On the other hand, cities that don’t
actively plan for their future will likely be left behind.
3. Planning
improves impact . - Local leaders are elected and appointed to deliver
improvement. Given the magnitude of the challenges cities face, it is unlikely
that all desired improvements will happen at once. Successful cities build
momentum by undertaking priority projects that are aligned with the vision.
Planning identifies pressing issues and available resources and makes sure that
initiatives are not redundant or going in different directions.
4. An appropriate
Urban form is very important - Housing, employment, accessibility and safety
are key concerns for urban dwellers. These topics are strongly correlated to
urban form. The right policies on density, land use, public space and the
layout of infrastructure and services can make a difference in delivering
quality of life at the right price point. Designing a spatial pattern that
addresses citizens’ concerns is a means for delivering a better city.
5. Urban planning
positively impacts urban economy - Making sure there are plenty of jobs in a
city is a priority for local leaders. Cities compete to attract investment with
a view to generating economic activity. Planning coordinates the spatial
location and distribution of economic activity and facilitates value capture
from public investment and the transformation of rural to urban land.
6. A collectively
held plan allows cities to build lasting relationships - City leaders that are
able to see opportunity in urbanization would need to engage all possible
contributions toward capturing it. A collectively held framework gives local
leaders a road map to reach out to citizens, energize departments and mobilize
partners so that they become engaged in realizing the vision.
7. A broader
territorial perspective helps cities attain economies of scale - Cities do not
operate in vacuums. Their footprint is associated with a surrounding region
with which they share resources and opportunities. Rather than just looking
within municipal boundaries, cities that plan together can make a competitive
advantage out of cross-municipal coordination. In addition to spatial
efficiencies, this would allow them to draw on economies of scale to boost
their negotiation power.
8. Continuity
generates credibility - Successful cities have ensured continuity of plans
through political cycles, realizing that a stable road map would make them more
credible. Investment is a long term endeavour that benefits from predictable
conditions. Spatial planning is an asset to reduce uncertainties and thus its
continuity contributes to the creation of transparent opportunities for an
engaged society.
9. Anticipating is
more cost effective than reacting to problems - Local leaders have the
opportunity of driving constructive change if they move away from laissez
faire. Cities that plan in sufficient scale would be in a position of
anticipating rather than reacting, hence being able to tackle the root of the
problem. Unplanned spatial patterns are inefficient and require more resources
to maintain, and the high cost of bad or no decisions is likely to make them
irreversible.
10. A framework gives consistency to
messages - Communication is a key asset for cities, but the opportunity
to connect and convey a city’s advantages can be undermined by
empty or contradictory messages. Momentum and support are increased when the
local leader can demonstrate substantive, even if incremental, progress that is
consistent with the collective vision and framework for action.
Definition of Town
Planning
What is
planning?
A range of views and definitions A fellow of the UK
Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI), Kelvin MacDonald (2005, p. 25).
MacDonald offered two definitions: [Informally, a
planner is a] post-modernist, moderator, politician, rationalist, advocate,
realist, economist, critic, risk-taker, developer, healer, geographer, sage,
critical thinker, environmentalist, urbanist, manager, technocrat, strategist,
statistician, negotiator, economist, ruralist, deconstructionist,
internationalist, administrator… [More formally, planning concerns] the better
use of land, shaping space, community and safety, improving the quality of the
environment, sustainable development, encouraging growth in the economy,
housing, improving the historic environment, the best use of resources and
quality. (p. 25)
Planning is the act of
researching, analysing, anticipating and influencing change in our society. In
urban areas planners guide and manage the way suburbs and regions develop,
making sure that they are good places in which to live, work and play. Planners
are involved in making decisions about land use proposals and other types of
developments. In making decisions, planners have to balance the needs of
communities and the environment.
What is town (and
country) planning?
- Town and
country planning is the process of making decisions on the development and
use of land. It is a tool for guiding and facilitating development and
regeneration in a way that also preserves the best features of our
environment
- “the
determining and drawing up plans for the future physical arrangement and
condition of a community or the comprehensive planning of the physical and
social development of a town.”
- “the
physical, social and economic planning of an urban environment (such as a
town)”
Some Shifts in Modern
Planning
- Before,
Product-Oriented; now Process-Oriented. Planning process is as
important as planning output.
- Before,
All-Inclusive; now Strategic
- Before,
Compartmental due to administrative boundaries; now Integrated
(Trans-border)
- Before,
“Agency-led”; now “Community-Based”
- Before,
“Top-Down”; now “Bottom-Up”
- Before,
Open Participation; now Focused Participation
Attributes of
Planning Process
- SCIENCE
AND ART – requires quantifiable tools as well as subjective
creativity
- MULTI-DISCIPLINARY
Requires the expertise of various discipline economics; engineering;
sociology; architecture; law; geography etc.
- COMPREHENSIVE:
Covers all aspects of man/women and his/her environment; physical, social,
economics, political administration and the natural environment.
Participatory
- DYNAMIC:
Changes overtime, technological change; cultural norms and traditions; not
static; responsive to new demands and needs of people.
- CONTINUOUS
/ ITERATIVE: Plan is prepared, approved, implemented; reviewed and
evaluated; replan again based on new demands of the time.
- PARTICIPATORY:
values the engagement of MULTI-SECTORAL stakeholders.
- CYCLIC /
SPIRAL: Unending process; Always goes back to where it started; Were the
problems solved? Goals and objectives attained? At what level of
satisfaction?
- TIME
BOUND: Plan must have a time perspective; short, medium, long range; Basis
for plan review and assessment.:
Reference:
ü M. Pulido, " Enhancing Capacities of Environmental Planners, "
ü https://www.planning.org.au/documents/item/2115
ü http://www.urbangateway.org/content/news/top-ten-reasons-why-cities-need-urban-planning
ü https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/planning
ü http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/planning.html
ü https://www.productivity.govt.nz/sites/default/files/urban-planning-final-report-chapter-03.pdf
ü http://townplanninglectures.blogspot.com/2009/01/definitions-of-town-planning.html
0 Comments