Digest: Justimbaste v. Commission on Elections (572 SCRA 273, 2008)
Facts: Priscila R. Justimbaste (Priscila) filed with the Leyte Provincial Election Supervisor a petition to disqualify respondent Rustico B. Balderian (Rustico) as a candidate for mayor of Tabontabon, Leyte for falsification and misinterpretation in his application for candidacy. Rustico denied Priscila‘s allegations. Rustico won and was proclaimed as mayor. The Second Division of the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) denied the petition for disqualification. Priscila then filed a Motion for Reconsideration to the COMELEC En Banc which subsequently denied the same.
Issue: Whether or not Rustico committed material misrepresentation and falsification in his certificate of candidacy.
Ruling:
Material misrepresentation as a ground to deny due course or cancel
a certificate of candidacy refers to the falsity of a statement
required to be entered therein, as enumerated in Section 74 of the Omnibus Election
Code. Concurrent with materiality is a deliberate intention to deceive the electorate as
to one‘s qualifications. Priscila asserts that private Balderian
committed material misrepresentation when he stated in
his certificate of candidacy that he is a Filipino citizen and that
his name is Rustico Besa Balderian, instead of Chu Teck Siao. At all events,
the use of a name other than that stated in
the certificate of birth is not a
material misrepresentation, as “material misrepresentation” under
Section 78 of the Omnibus Election Code refers to
“qualifications for elective office.” It need not be emphasized that there
is no showing that there was intent to deceive the electorate as
to private respondent‘s identity, nor that by using his Filipino name
the voting public was thereby deceived. Priscila is reminded that
a petition for disqualification based on
material misrepresentation in the certificate of candidacy
is different from an election protest. The purpose of an election protest is to
ascertain whether the candidate proclaimed elected by the board of canvassers
is really the lawful choice of the electorate.
0 Comments